Tradition Refined

Before writing this review, we spent more than a year fishing both the original Pure and the new Pure 2 on waters across the country. From small Ozark spring creeks to larger Western rivers, we wanted real time on the water with both rods before offering an opinion. At Feather Craft, Winston has long been one of our favorite rod makers, and a rod with this kind of reputation deserves more than a quick first impression.

Winston Pure 2 Enscription

For decades, Winston has occupied a unique place in fly fishing. In our shop at Feather Craft, Winston rods occupy the first spots in our display racks for a reason. They represent many of the things we value most in fly fishing: presentation, feel, rhythm, and restraint. To us, they are truly anglers’ tools.

While many manufacturers chased faster actions, stiffer blanks, and ever-increasing line speed, Winston continued building rods centered around feel, touch, and presentation. A Winston rod has never simply been about casting line. In our experience, it has always been about tempo, timing, and the experience of fishing itself.

The original Winston Pure embodied that philosophy perfectly.

When the Pure was introduced as a dedicated dry fly rod series, we immediately understood what Winston was trying to accomplish. The rod quickly became something of a cult classic among anglers who valued delicate presentation over brute force. It was unapologetically smooth, deeply loaded, and distinctly “Winston” in every sense of the word. It rewarded relaxed casting strokes and punished aggressive ones. For anglers who understood it, the rod became addictive. Over the years, we’ve had countless customers tell us they will never part with theirs.

Then came the Winston Pure 2.

Rather than abandoning the character of the original, Winston refined it. The Pure 2 was not designed to become faster or more aggressive. Instead, Winston focused on improving consistency throughout the lineup, reducing swing weight, increasing recovery speed, and enhancing accuracy while preserving the soulful feel that made the original Pure so beloved.

The result is one of the more interesting rod evolutions we’ve seen in recent years because the Pure and Pure 2 are remarkably similar in philosophy, yet noticeably different on the water.

Both rods are exceptional. Both are purpose-built dry fly tools. But from our perspective at Feather Craft, they appeal to slightly different anglers and slightly different styles of fishing.


The Original Winston Pure

The Rod That Slowed Everything Down

The original Pure arrived during an era dominated by ultra-fast graphite rods. Most trout rods at the time were being marketed around power, distance, and versatility. Winston took the opposite approach, and honestly, that is one of the reasons we admired the series from the beginning.

The Pure was designed around presentation.

To be clear, it was not designed for distance, not for punching casts through heavy wind, and certainly not for throwing weighted rigs. Winston built it as a dedicated dry fly presentation rod, and we appreciate that they never tried to make it something it wasn’t.

The Pure featured a medium to medium-slow action with exceptionally deep loading characteristics. The rod bent progressively into the blank and transmitted an enormous amount of feel into the caster’s hand. Short casts felt alive. Roll casts felt effortless. Dry flies landed softly.

You could not overpower the Pure. Trying to rush the casting stroke caused tailing loops and collapsed presentations. But once you relaxed and allowed the rod to work, the Pure rewarded you with extraordinary smoothness.

In our experience, the Pure made average casters noticeably better because it forced them to slow down and focus on timing rather than power.

At typical trout distances of twenty to forty feet, the rod excelled. Small dry flies, light tippets, and technical presentations felt intuitive. Spring creeks, tailwaters, and smaller freestone rivers were where the rod truly belonged, and they remain some of our favorite places to fish it.

The original Pure also possessed a unique emotional quality that is difficult to quantify. Many rods cast well. Few rods feel memorable. The Pure felt memorable.

That is why so many anglers still refuse to sell theirs, and frankly, we understand why.


Criticisms of the Original Pure

The same characteristics that made the original Pure special also limited it in the eyes of some anglers.

The rod was never intended to be highly versatile. It struggled when pushed beyond its intended purpose.

Long-distance casts required careful timing. Heavy nymph rigs overwhelmed the blank. Strong wind exposed the softer recovery speed. Anglers with naturally fast casting strokes often found the rod vague or unstable.

Perhaps the biggest criticism of the original Pure was inconsistency throughout the lineup. Over the years, we heard several anglers mention that different models within the series felt surprisingly different from one another. Some rods felt considerably softer, while others felt slightly quicker.

That inconsistency created both charm and frustration.

Certain models became legendary among Winston enthusiasts while others felt more niche or specialized. The 8-foot 3-weight, for example, developed an especially loyal following, and in our shop it remains one of the most talked-about Winston rods ever produced.

It was a dry fly rod in the purest sense of the term.


Enter the Winston Pure 2

Evolution, Not Reinvention

When Winston introduced the Pure 2, many anglers feared the company might move toward a faster, more modern action. We heard those concerns almost immediately when the rod was announced.

Winston Pure 2 Nanotechnology

That fear proved unfounded. The Pure 2 remains unmistakably Winston. What changed was refinement.

According to Winston itself, the Pure 2 was redesigned from the ground up using new NanoParticle graphite technology. Winston eliminated boron from the construction process and focused on improving strength, stability, recovery speed, and overall consistency throughout the lineup.

The Pure 2 still bends deeply. It still rewards a smooth casting stroke. It still prioritizes dry fly presentation above all else. But in our hands, the rod feels cleaner and more controlled.

That difference becomes immediately noticeable during longer casts or when dealing with wind. The Pure 2 recovers faster than the original Pure and tracks more accurately at distance. To us, the Pure 2 manages to preserve the delicacy of the original while adding reserve power the first generation occasionally lacked.


The Biggest Difference

Consistency Across the Lineup

Perhaps the most important improvement in the Pure 2 is consistency.

The original Pure lineup occasionally felt like a collection of individual rods rather than a cohesive family. The Pure 2 addresses that directly.

Winston engineer Hank Haen reportedly redesigned the series so each model would maintain a consistent feel and casting personality throughout the lineup.

That matters more than many anglers realize, especially for those of us who regularly cast multiple models side by side in the shop and on the water.

Consistency allows anglers to move between line weights without dramatically adjusting casting tempo or expectations. A 3-weight Pure 2 feels related to the 4-weight and 5-weight in a way the original lineup sometimes did not.

We have several Winston enthusiasts as customers building multi-rod Pure 2 quivers, and for them that improvement has been substantial.


Recovery Speed and Stability

The Pure 2 recovers noticeably faster than the original.

Not fast in the modern graphite sense. Not stiff. Not overly crisp. Just cleaner.

The original Pure could occasionally feel “wobbly” when pushed hard, particularly at longer distances. The Pure 2 maintains better torsional stability and tracks straighter through the casting stroke.

From our perspective, that translates into several practical advantages:

  • Better accuracy past forty feet

  • Improved line control in wind

  • Cleaner loop formation

  • Less tip bounce

  • Greater confidence with longer leaders

The improvement is especially noticeable for anglers who fish technical tailwaters or larger spring creeks where precision matters, which is exactly the kind of fishing many of our customers buy Winston rods for.

The Pure 2 remains a presentation rod, but it feels less fragile than the original.


Feel and Sensitivity

Despite the improved recovery speed, Winston preserved the rod’s defining characteristic: feel.

In fact, several of our customers argue the Pure 2 actually enhances feel due to the new graphite construction. The rod flexes more smoothly throughout the blank while transmitting subtle feedback directly into the hand.

In our view, this is where Winston continues separating itself from many modern rod manufacturers.

Short casts remain deeply satisfying. Roll casts remain effortless. The rod still encourages relaxed timing and deliberate presentation.

But unlike the original, the Pure 2 feels less vulnerable when conditions become less than ideal.


Dry Fly Performance

Both rods are exceptional dry fly tools. That is ultimately the point, and at Feather Craft we think that specialization is part of what makes these rods so appealing.

The original Pure excels at intimate dry fly fishing. Small streams, close-range casts, and technical trout inside forty feet are where it shines brightest. But the Pure 2 broadens that range slightly.

The additional stability and reserve power allow anglers to fish larger rivers and more technical situations with greater confidence. We’ve also noticed improved accuracy and cleaner long-distance tracking compared to the original.

Still, neither rod is intended to be an all-purpose trout rod.

Let’s speak plainly here. These are not streamer rods. They are not heavy indicator rods. They are not aggressive euro nymphing rods.

Both rods exist for anglers who care deeply about dry fly fishing and presentation, and around here, we think there is something refreshing about a rod that knows exactly what it wants to be.


The New Lengths

One of the more interesting changes in the Pure 2 lineup is Winston’s move toward unconventional rod lengths.

Instead of traditional 8-foot and 8’6” configurations, Winston introduced several 7’9” and 8’3” models designed specifically to improve balance, stability, and presentation.

At first glance, three inches may seem insignificant. On the water, however, the difference becomes surprisingly noticeable.

The slightly shorter lengths reduce swing weight and improve tracking without sacrificing much reach. The rods feel exceptionally nimble and precise, particularly during technical dry fly presentations.

The 7’9” 4-weight has already become one of the standout models in the series, and after fishing it ourselves, we understand exactly why. We’ve found it incredibly accurate and surprisingly versatile on smaller trout water.

R.L. Winston - Winston Air - 2 Reach Series Fly Rods - Feather Craft Fly Fishing


Which Rod Feels More “Winston”?

This is where opinions become deeply personal.

Some longtime Winston anglers still prefer the original Pure because it feels softer and slower. It possesses a slightly more relaxed tempo and a deeper loading sensation that some anglers find intoxicating.

Others believe the Pure 2 represents the best modern expression of Winston’s identity because it preserves the feel while improving nearly every measurable performance category.

At Feather Craft, we honestly understand both perspectives. The original Pure feels more nostalgic. The Pure 2 feels more refined.

Comments

Awesome article!!

— James Jones

Because I fish primarily bamboo I suppose I’m coming from the extreme side of the slow action spectrum. That being said the obvious aspect of the Pure 2 rods is swing rate. I now own 3 Pure 2 rods, the 7’3” 2wt. The 7’9” 4wt. and the 7’9” 3wt. They all sing from the same song sheet. Honestly they are the first graphite rods I’ve purchased in 27 years. All my other rods are bamboo and rods that I made myself over the years. The thing about cane is that it gives you a ton of feedback and is often unforgiving by design. A “dedicated” dry fly rod that is graphite got my attention about a year ago. But I was very hesitant to pick up a graphite rod in general since I make bamboo dry fly rods especially in this size niche. Casting the Pure 2 reminds me of the old Sage Light Line rods but with way better recovery and more precision. I would also go out on a limb and say they are just as much fun to cast a small dry as my own rods. The engineering is quite extraordinary to say the least. Yesterday I caught a very picky 16” Brown in some small water on a #16 CDC bubble wing caddis with my 7’9” 4wt. Pure 2 using a SA DT. I fished over him for about 20 minutes never spooking him making deliveries with 3-4 different flys. I finally hooked up on the bubble wing. I didn’t give up neither did my rod.
It was a wonderful way to end the day. Give the engineer at Winston a cigar.
-Clint B.

— Clint Bova
Alphlexo Crab
Umpqua
$9.99
12/0 Euro Thread
Cascade Crest
$2.95
4/0 Kevlar Thread
Ray Rumpf
$4.95
Amys Ant
Umpqua
$3.29
AJ's Drewster
Rainys
$3.29
Aquaseal & Cotol Combo
Gear Aid
$12.95
444 Peach Double Taper
Cortland Line Company
$69.95
333 Bass Panfish
Cortland Line Company
$49.95
Abel Vaya Fly Reel
Abel
$297.50
Angled Tweezers
Feather Craft
$7.95